going: is hungry good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light
Weight: 0.48
, song
Weight: 0.48
, right
Weight: 0.48
, time
Weight: 0.48
, factor
Weight: 0.46
Siblings do
Weight: 0.32
, okay
Weight: 0.32
, everybody
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hungry good 1.00
is hungry bad 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(going, is hungry good)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(going, is hungry bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(going, is hungry bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(going, is hungry bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(going, is hungry bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(going, is hungry good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(going, is hungry good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(going, is hungry good)