gold: be less conductive than silver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.70
, medal
Weight: 0.64
, mineral
Weight: 0.63
, metal
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
Siblings emerald
Weight: 0.54
, silver
Weight: 0.39
, copper
Weight: 0.38
, rhenium
Weight: 0.37
, platinum
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less conductive than silver 1.00
be less reactive than silver 0.87
be more expensive than silver 0.85
be expensive than silver 0.84
be much more expensive than silver 0.83
be heavier than silver 0.82
be easier than silver 0.81
be more valuable than silver 0.81
be more expensive than copper 0.81
be much worse than silver 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be more expensive than copper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be more expensive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(silver, be more expensive than copper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(gold, be less reactive than silver)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(gold, be less reactive than silver)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gold, be more expensive than silver)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(gold, be less reactive than silver)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than silver)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gold, be expensive than silver)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gold, be expensive than silver)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gold, be more expensive than silver)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gold, be expensive than silver)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gold, be heavier than silver)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gold, be heavier than silver)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gold, be heavier than silver)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(gold, be much more expensive than silver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(gold, be much more expensive than silver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(gold, be much more expensive than silver)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gold, be much worse than silver)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(gold, be much worse than silver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(gold, be more valuable than silver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(gold, be less reactive than silver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gold, be much worse than silver)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gold, be more expensive than silver)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gold, be heavier than silver)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gold, be expensive than silver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(gold, be easier than silver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gold, be more valuable than silver)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gold, be easier than silver)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gold, be much more expensive than silver)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more valuable than silver)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(gold, be easier than silver)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gold, be easier than silver)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gold, be more valuable than silver)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gold, be much worse than silver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gold, be less conductive than silver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gold, be less conductive than silver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(silver, be more expensive than copper)