golf course: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents course
Weight: 0.76
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.67
, water sport
Weight: 0.67
Siblings swimming pool
Weight: 0.65
, tennis court
Weight: 0.64
, caddy
Weight: 0.60
, fairway
Weight: 0.51
, putt
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
pollute environment 0.78
have poor environmental reputations 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golf course, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golf course, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(caddy, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(caddy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(caddy, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(golf course, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf course, pollute environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(golf course, pollute environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(golf course, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(golf course, pollute environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(golf course, pollute environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golf course, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(course, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(caddy, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(golf course, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(course, has quality bad)