golf course: have environmental reputations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents course
Weight: 0.76
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.67
, water sport
Weight: 0.67
Siblings swimming pool
Weight: 0.65
, tennis court
Weight: 0.64
, caddy
Weight: 0.60
, fairway
Weight: 0.51
, putt
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
have environmental reputations 1.00
have poor environmental reputations 0.98
have reputations 0.93
have poor reputations 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(golf course, have environmental reputations)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(golf course, have reputations)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, have poor reputations)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(golf course, have reputations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(golf course, have poor reputations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf course, have poor reputations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf course, have reputations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(golf course, have poor environmental reputations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(golf course, have reputations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(golf course, have poor reputations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(golf course, have environmental reputations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(golf course, have environmental reputations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(golf course, have environmental reputations)