good will: is hunting called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, charity
Weight: 0.57
, asset
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings good
Weight: 0.35
, good person
Weight: 0.35
, good book
Weight: 0.35
, good luck
Weight: 0.35
, nice
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hunting called 1.00
is hunting 0.98
is hunting good 0.96
hunt 15 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(good will, is hunting called)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(good will, is hunting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(good will, is hunting)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(good will, hunt 15)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(good will, hunt 15)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(good will, hunt 15)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(good will, is hunting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(good will, is hunting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(good will, hunt 15)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(good will, is hunting good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(good will, is hunting good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(good will, is hunting good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(good will, is hunting good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(good will, is hunting called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(good will, is hunting called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(good will, is hunting called)