good: be at grocery store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thought
Weight: 0.62
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings good person
Weight: 0.36
, good book
Weight: 0.36
, good luck
Weight: 0.36
, nice
Weight: 0.36
, good weather
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grocery store 1.00
be store 0.91
be at supermarket 0.91
be at store 0.90
be store on store shelf 0.86
be buy at store 0.84
be at mall 0.79
be at shop 0.79
be store in cupboard 0.79
be at bookstore 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(good, be at grocery store)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(good, be at grocery store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(thing, be buy at store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(thing, be store in cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(good book, be at bookstore)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(good, be at grocery store)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(good, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(good book, be at bookstore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(good book, be at bookstore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(good, be at grocery store)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(good, be at supermarket)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(good, be store on store shelf)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(good, be at supermarket)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(good, be at supermarket)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(good, be store)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(good, be at grocery store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(thing, be store in cupboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(good book, be at bookstore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(good, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(thing, be store in cupboard)