good: be distributed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thought
Weight: 0.62
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings good person
Weight: 0.36
, good book
Weight: 0.36
, good luck
Weight: 0.36
, nice
Weight: 0.36
, good will
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be distributed 1.00
be distributed in society 0.90
were distributed in times 0.90
were distributed in past 0.89
be distributed in market system 0.88
be distributed in free market system 0.85
be distributed in market economy 0.81
be distributed in free market economy 0.80
be distributed in socialist society 0.77
be distributed in communist society 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(good, be distributed)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(good, be distributed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(good, be distributed in free market system)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(good, were distributed in past)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(good, be distributed in free market system)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(good, be distributed in free market system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(good, be distributed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(good, be distributed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(good, were distributed in past)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(good, be distributed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(good, were distributed in past)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(good, be distributed in free market system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(good, were distributed in past)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(good, be distributed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(good, be distributed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(good, be distributed)