gorilla: be considered mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents great ape
Weight: 0.79
, species
Weight: 0.60
, ape
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chimpanzee
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.39
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, rhino
Weight: 0.37
, panda bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered mammals 1.00
is mammal 0.88
be considered animal 0.79
has state primates 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, is mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, is mammal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(chimpanzee, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, is mammal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(orangutan, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(orangutan, is mammal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(rhino, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(rhino, is mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(gorilla, be considered mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, is mammal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gorilla, is mammal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered animal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, has state primates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gorilla, is mammal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(gorilla, be considered animal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(gorilla, is mammal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gorilla, has state primates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gorilla, be considered animal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(gorilla, be considered animal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(gorilla, has state primates)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(gorilla, has state primates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(gorilla, be considered mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(orangutan, is mammal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rhino, is mammal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, is mammal)