government: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents regulator
Weight: 0.66
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.65
, enterprise
Weight: 0.65
, sector
Weight: 0.65
Siblings united state
Weight: 0.70
, united arab emirates
Weight: 0.66
, national assembly
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.62
, democracy
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00
be corrupt in canada 0.86
be organised in uk 0.85
be chosen in australia 0.81
compare to america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(government, be in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(government, be corrupt in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(government, be corrupt in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(government, be corrupt in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(government, be organised in uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(government, be corrupt in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(government, be organised in uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(government, compare to america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(government, be organised in uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(government, compare to america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(government, compare to america)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(government, be organised in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(government, compare to america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(government, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(government, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(government, be in canada)