grand jury: be chosen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court
Weight: 0.62
, case
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, jury
Weight: 0.60
Siblings first degree murder
Weight: 0.61
, county court
Weight: 0.34
, supreme court
Weight: 0.34
, court case
Weight: 0.33
, tennis court
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chosen 1.00
were selected in athens 0.82
be named 0.77
were selected in ancient athens 0.77
is named 0.76
get selected for profile cases 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(grand jury, be chosen)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jury, were selected in athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(grand jury, be chosen)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jury, get selected for profile cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(grand jury, be chosen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jury, were selected in ancient athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(grand jury, be chosen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(jury, be chosen)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jury, were selected in athens)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jury, were selected in ancient athens)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(jury, get selected for profile cases)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(jury, were selected in ancient athens)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(jury, were selected in athens)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(jury, be chosen)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(jury, get selected for profile cases)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(court case, be named)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(court case, is named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(grand jury, be chosen)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jury, were selected in athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(grand jury, be chosen)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jury, get selected for profile cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(grand jury, be chosen)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jury, were selected in ancient athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(grand jury, be chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(court case, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(court case, be named)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(court case, is named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(court case, is named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(grand jury, be chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(grand jury, be chosen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(jury, be chosen)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(jury, get selected for profile cases)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jury, were selected in athens)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jury, were selected in ancient athens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(court case, be named)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(court case, is named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(jury, be chosen)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(jury, get selected for profile cases)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jury, were selected in athens)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(grand jury, be chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jury, were selected in ancient athens)