grand jury: has time yesterday

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court
Weight: 0.62
, case
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, jury
Weight: 0.60
Siblings first degree murder
Weight: 0.61
, county court
Weight: 0.34
, supreme court
Weight: 0.34
, court case
Weight: 0.33
, tennis court
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has time yesterday 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand jury, has time yesterday)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(jury, has time yesterday)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(jury, has time yesterday)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(court case, has time yesterday)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(grand jury, has time yesterday)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(court case, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(court case, has time yesterday)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(grand jury, has time yesterday)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, has time yesterday)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand jury, has time yesterday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(jury, has time yesterday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(court case, has time yesterday)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(grand jury, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(jury, has time yesterday)