grand slam: be called open

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home run
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, title
Weight: 0.58
, double
Weight: 0.54
Siblings wimbledon
Weight: 0.60
, slam dunk
Weight: 0.33
, gala
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called open 1.00
be different to open 0.90
be different to french open 0.80
be called sw19 0.77
be called run dmc 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be different to open)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be different to french open)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be called sw19)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(wimbledon, be called sw19) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be called sw19)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wimbledon, be different to open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be different to open)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(wimbledon, be different to french open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be different to french open)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(grand slam, be called open)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(grand slam, be called open)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be different to open)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be called sw19)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be called open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be different to french open)