grand slam: has time yesterday

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home run
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, title
Weight: 0.58
, double
Weight: 0.54
Siblings wimbledon
Weight: 0.60
, slam dunk
Weight: 0.33
, gala
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has time yesterday 1.00
be week later year 0.82
be in week later 2017 0.82
be in week later 2015 0.82
has time now 0.81
be long week 0.80
be week year 0.79
has time recent 0.79
be on today 0.79
has state night 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, be long week)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand slam, has time yesterday)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(double, has time now)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand slam, has time yesterday)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(double, has time now)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(event, be long week)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(event, be long week)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(double, has time now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gala, has state night)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be week later year)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be in week later 2017)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be in week later 2015)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be week year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, be on today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, be long week)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(double, has time now)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wimbledon, be on today)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be on today)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wimbledon, be week year)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be week year)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(wimbledon, be in week later 2015)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be in week later 2015)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(wimbledon, be in week later 2017)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be in week later 2017)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gala, has state night)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(gala, has state night)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wimbledon, be week later year)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, be week later year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(grand slam, has time yesterday)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grand slam, has time yesterday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(double, has time now)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(event, be long week)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be on today)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gala, has state night)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be week year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be in week later 2015)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be in week later 2017)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(wimbledon, be week later year)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(double, has time now)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(grand slam, has time yesterday)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(event, be long week)