grandma: be called nana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.71
, mom
Weight: 0.66
, friend
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nana
Weight: 0.50
, grandmother
Weight: 0.41
, aunt
Weight: 0.39
, dad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called nana 1.00
be called mimi 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grandmother, be called mimi)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grandmother, be called nana)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(grandmother, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(grandmother, be called nana)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grandmother, be called mimi)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(grandmother, be called mimi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(grandma, be called nana)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be called mimi)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(grandma, be called mimi)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(grandma, be called mimi)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(grandma, be called mimi)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be called nana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grandma, be called nana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(grandmother, be called nana)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be called nana)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grandmother, be called mimi)