granite: be less porous than marble

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stone
Weight: 0.74
, igneous rock
Weight: 0.66
, rock
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings marble
Weight: 0.39
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.38
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, concrete
Weight: 0.35
, sapphire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less porous than marble 1.00
be porous 0.89
be used to play marble 0.82
be at bag of marble 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(marble, be porous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marble, be at bag of marble)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(marble, be used to play marble)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(marble, be porous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(marble, be porous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(marble, be at bag of marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(marble, be at bag of marble)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(marble, be used to play marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(marble, be used to play marble)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(granite, be less porous than marble)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(granite, be less porous than marble)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(marble, be used to play marble)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(marble, be at bag of marble)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(granite, be less porous than marble) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(marble, be porous)