grant: be fuhr thought nt even good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fuhr thought nt even good 1.00
be fuhr thought nt good 0.99
be fuhr thought nt 0.97
is thought 0.81
is fuhr thought 0.81
be much more expensive in canada 0.78
be expensive on ps3 ut 0.78
be more skinny than than other jason 0.77
consume more cpu than other daw 's 0.77
be more skinny than than jason 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, consume more cpu than other daw 's)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tool, consume more cpu than other daw 's)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tool, consume more cpu than other daw 's)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(part, be much more expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, be expensive on ps3 ut)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, consume more cpu than other daw 's)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, be expensive on ps3 ut)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, be expensive on ps3 ut)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(grant, is thought)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grant, is fuhr thought)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(grant, is thought)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(grant, is thought)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(grant, is fuhr thought)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(grant, is thought)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(grant, is fuhr thought)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, is fuhr thought)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tool, consume more cpu than other daw 's)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(part, be much more expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(contract, be expensive on ps3 ut)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tool, consume more cpu than other daw 's)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grant, be fuhr thought nt even good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(part, be much more expensive in canada)