grant: be important to lawmakers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to lawmakers 1.00
be on bill 0.76
be important part of government 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important to lawmakers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(contract, be important to lawmakers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(grant, be important to lawmakers)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grant, be important part of government)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(grant, be important part of government)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, be important part of government)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, be important part of government)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, be important to lawmakers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grant, be important to lawmakers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, be important to lawmakers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, be important to lawmakers)