grant: be in aid important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in aid important 1.00
be in aid 0.97
be in aid called 0.95
be in aid to states 0.91
be controversial in aid 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(grant, be in aid important)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(grant, be in aid called)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(grant, be in aid to states)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(grant, be in aid called)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grant, be in aid called)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(grant, be in aid called)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, be in aid to states)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grant, be controversial in aid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(grant, be in aid to states)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(grant, be in aid to states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(grant, be controversial in aid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(grant, be controversial in aid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(grant, be controversial in aid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, be in aid important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grant, be in aid important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grant, be in aid important)