grant: is compared as military leaders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is compared as military leaders 1.00
is compared as leaders 0.93
was different than other generals 0.80
was different than other northern generals 0.79
was different than generals 0.79
was different than northern generals 0.79
is compared 0.78
was recognized as union commander 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(grant, is compared as leaders)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(grant, was different than generals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(grant, is compared)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(grant, was different than other generals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(grant, was different than other northern generals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(grant, is compared as leaders)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grant, was different than northern generals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(grant, is compared)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(grant, is compared as leaders)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(grant, was different than generals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(grant, was recognized as union commander)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(grant, was different than other northern generals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(grant, was different than other generals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(grant, was different than northern generals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(grant, is compared)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(grant, was different than generals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(grant, is compared as leaders)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(grant, was recognized as union commander)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(grant, was different than other northern generals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(grant, was different than northern generals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(grant, was different than other generals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(grant, was recognized as union commander)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(grant, was recognized as union commander)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(grant, was different than northern generals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, was different than other generals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, was different than other northern generals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(grant, is compared)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(grant, was different than generals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(grant, is compared as military leaders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(grant, is compared as military leaders)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grant, is compared as military leaders)