grant: was general

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was general 1.00
was good general 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(grant, was general)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(grant, was good general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grant, was good general)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(grant, was good general)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(grant, was good general)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(grant, was general)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(grant, was general)