grape: be at good die

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.76
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, pear tree
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, blueberry
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at good die 1.00
be good to eat 0.80
be good 0.77
be very good for you 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fruit, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grape, be at good die)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fruit, be good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grape, be at good die)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fruit, be very good for you)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grape, be at good die)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fruit, be very good for you)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be very good for you)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fruit, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(grape, be at good die)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fruit, be good)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(grape, be at good die)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fruit, be very good for you)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(grape, be at good die)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pear, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pear, be good to eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(grape, be at good die)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grape, be at good die)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fruit, be good to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fruit, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fruit, be very good for you)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pear, be good to eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fruit, be good to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fruit, be good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grape, be at good die)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fruit, be very good for you)