grape: be at vinery

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.76
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, pear tree
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, blueberry
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at vinery 1.00
be at garden of eden 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at garden of eden)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(apple tree, be at garden of eden)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at garden of eden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(grape, be at vinery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at vinery)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(grape, be at vinery)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at vinery)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at garden of eden)