graph: be defined as best way to convey complex data

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chart
Weight: 0.66
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33
, map
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as best way to convey complex data 1.00
be make to understand where thing be 0.77
distort part of what it represent 0.76
be defined as picture of world 0.76
wants to calculate thing quickly 0.75
be used to find way 0.75
be used to do arithmetic calculation accurately 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(map, be defined as picture of world)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculator, wants to calculate thing quickly)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(map, be make to understand where thing be)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to find way)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be used to do arithmetic calculation accurately)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(calculator, be used to do arithmetic calculation accurately)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(calculator, be used to do arithmetic calculation accurately)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(calculator, wants to calculate thing quickly)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(calculator, wants to calculate thing quickly)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(map, be make to understand where thing be)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(map, be make to understand where thing be)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(map, be used to find way)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(map, be used to find way)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(map, distort part of what it represent)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(map, be defined as picture of world)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(map, be defined as picture of world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(map, be make to understand where thing be)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(map, be used to find way)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculator, be used to do arithmetic calculation accurately)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(calculator, wants to calculate thing quickly)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(graph, be defined as best way to convey complex data)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(map, be defined as picture of world)