graphics: have damn expensive cards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.57
, design
Weight: 0.47
, topic
Weight: 0.44
, department
Weight: 0.39
, tool
Weight: 0.38
Siblings screen
Weight: 0.31
, animation
Weight: 0.31
, interface
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.30
, color
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have damn expensive cards 1.00
have damn cards 0.97
have expensive cards 0.92
have expensive 2017 cards 0.92
have expensive right cards 0.92
have getting expensive cards 0.91
have getting more expensive cards 0.90
have cheap now cards 0.90
have cheap cards 0.90
have now cards 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have expensive right cards)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(graphics, have expensive right cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(graphics, have expensive right cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(graphics, have cheap now cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(graphics, have cheap now cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have cheap now cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(graphics, have now cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have cheap cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(graphics, have now cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have getting expensive cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(graphics, have cheap cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(graphics, have cheap cards)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have now cards)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(graphics, have getting expensive cards)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(graphics, have now cards)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(graphics, have cheap now cards)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(graphics, have getting expensive cards)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(graphics, have expensive right cards)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(graphics, have cheap cards)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(graphics, have getting expensive cards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have damn expensive cards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(graphics, have damn expensive cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(graphics, have damn expensive cards)