graphite: be good conductor of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.63
, ceramic
Weight: 0.60
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.56
, tool
Weight: 0.55
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good conductor of heat 1.00
be good conductor of electricity 0.90
is good conductor electricity 0.90
is conductor 0.89
be conductor of electricity 0.88
be poor conductor at high temperatures 0.87
absorb heat 0.76
lose quickly heat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, be good conductor of electricity)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is conductor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, absorb heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, be good conductor of electricity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(aluminum foil, absorb heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(graphite, be good conductor of electricity)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of electricity)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of electricity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is good conductor electricity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(graphite, is good conductor electricity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(graphite, is good conductor electricity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(graphite, be conductor of electricity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be conductor of electricity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(graphite, be conductor of electricity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be poor conductor at high temperatures)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(graphite, be poor conductor at high temperatures)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(graphite, be poor conductor at high temperatures)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(graphite, be good conductor of electricity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(graphite, is good conductor electricity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(graphite, be conductor of electricity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is conductor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(graphite, be poor conductor at high temperatures)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(graphite, is conductor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(graphite, is conductor)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(graphite, is conductor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(graphite, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, be good conductor of electricity)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is conductor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)