grasshopper: be considered pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.57
, crop
Weight: 0.55
Siblings dung beetle
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36
, ant
Weight: 0.36
, moth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered pests 1.00
is insects 0.87
be pest to farmers 0.86
is harmful insects 0.85
be called insect 0.84
is insect 0.84
be called grasshoppers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(insect, is insects)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(insect, is insects)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(insect, is insects)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(ant, is insect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(insect, is insects)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(ant, is insect)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ant, is insect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(grasshopper, be considered pests)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grasshopper, is insect)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be called insect)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, is insect)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(grasshopper, is insect)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(grasshopper, be pest to farmers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be pest to farmers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(grasshopper, be called insect)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, be called insect)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(grasshopper, be called grasshoppers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, be pest to farmers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be called grasshoppers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, be called grasshoppers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be called insect)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, is insect)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be pest to farmers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be called grasshoppers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(insect, is insects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ant, is insect)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grasshopper, be considered pests)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(insect, is insects)