great barrier reef: has physical part landmark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coral reef
Weight: 0.83
, reef
Weight: 0.82
, water
Weight: 0.64
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.63
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, shallow water
Weight: 0.34
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.34
, pier
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part landmark 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)