great britain: was good place have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents america
Weight: 0.71
, european union
Weight: 0.70
, north america
Weight: 0.68
, ireland
Weight: 0.66
, democracy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings britain
Weight: 0.60
, latin america
Weight: 0.38
, south america
Weight: 0.38
, central america
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good place have 1.00
was in need in 1773 0.82
was in need of money in 1773 0.80
was ideal place for start of industrail revolution 0.80
was in need of money 0.78
be called great 0.77
is great 0.76
do after brexit 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(america, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(great britain, was good place have)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(america, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(america, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(britain, be called great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is great)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(britain, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(america, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(great britain, was good place have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(britain, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(britain, is great)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(latin america, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(latin america, is great)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(britain, be called great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(britain, be called great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(great britain, was good place have)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was in need of money in 1773)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was ideal place for start of industrail revolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(great britain, is great)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(great britain, do after brexit)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(great britain, be called great)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(great britain, was good place have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(america, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(britain, be called great)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(britain, is great)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(latin america, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(great britain, was good place have) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(america, is great)