great dane: have webbed feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.56
, puppy
Weight: 0.54
, monster
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rottweiler
Weight: 0.45
, good luck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have webbed feet 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have webbed feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rottweiler, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have webbed feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(great dane, have webbed feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have webbed feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(great dane, have webbed feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have webbed feet)