great white shark: is are hunted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are hunted 1.00
is is hunted 0.96
is hunted 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shark, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(great white shark, is are hunted)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(shark, is hunted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(shark, is hunted)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is hunted)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is hunted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shark, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(whale shark, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is hunted)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tiger shark, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(great white shark, is are hunted)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great white shark, is is hunted)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is is hunted)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is is hunted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(great white shark, is is hunted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(great white shark, is are hunted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shark, is hunted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(whale shark, is hunted)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is hunted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(great white shark, is are hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shark, is hunted)