great white shark: is fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41
, great blue heron
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fish 1.00
be good predators of sea otters 0.80
be called sharks 0.78
be called great sharks 0.76
be called white sharks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(great white shark, is fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(shark, is fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(shark, is fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is fish)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, be called sharks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(whale shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is fish)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(whale shark, be called sharks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(whale shark, be called sharks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(great white shark, is fish)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be good predators of sea otters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be called sharks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(great white shark, be good predators of sea otters)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be good predators of sea otters)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(great white shark, be called sharks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be called sharks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(great white shark, be called sharks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(great white shark, be good predators of sea otters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(great white shark, is fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(shark, is fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(whale shark, is fish)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(whale shark, be called sharks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(shark, is fish)