green apple: be tart

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tart 1.00
be more tart than red apple 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(green apple, be tart)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(green apple, be more tart than red apple)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(green apple, be more tart than red apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(green apple, be more tart than red apple)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(green apple, be more tart than red apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(green apple, be tart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(green apple, be tart)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(green apple, be tart)