greenland: be distorted on map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.61
, land
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.57
, region
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cayman islands
Weight: 0.35
, long island
Weight: 0.34
, rhode island
Weight: 0.34
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.34
, staten island
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be distorted on map 1.00
be white on map 0.83
be blurred on google maps 0.83
be bigger on map 0.82
be large on map 0.82
be big on map 0.81
look bigger on map 0.81
be white on maps 0.80
be big on world map 0.80
appear large in relation on map using 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(area, be blurred on google maps)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(area, be blurred on google maps)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(area, be blurred on google maps)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(area, be blurred on google maps)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be blurred on google maps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(greenland, be blurred on google maps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(greenland, be blurred on google maps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be white on map)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(greenland, be white on map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(greenland, be white on map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be white on maps)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(greenland, be white on maps)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(greenland, be white on maps)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(greenland, be blurred on google maps)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(greenland, be white on map)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(greenland, be white on maps)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be bigger on map)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(greenland, look bigger on map)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(greenland, be bigger on map)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(greenland, look bigger on map)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be large on map)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(greenland, be large on map)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(greenland, be bigger on map)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(greenland, look bigger on map)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(greenland, be bigger on map)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(greenland, look bigger on map)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be big on map)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(greenland, be big on map)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(greenland, be big on world map)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be big on world map)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(greenland, be large on map)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(greenland, be large on map)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(greenland, be big on map)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(greenland, be big on world map)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(greenland, be big on map)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(greenland, be big on world map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(area, be blurred on google maps)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(greenland, be distorted on map)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(area, be blurred on google maps)