grizzly bear: be at risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents black bear
Weight: 0.77
, predator
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, carnivore
Weight: 0.73
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, polar bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at risk 1.00
protect from danger 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cougar, be at risk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be at risk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(polar bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be at risk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cougar, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cougar, be at risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, be at risk)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, protect from danger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, protect from danger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, protect from danger)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, protect from danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be at risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be at risk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cougar, be at risk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(polar bear, be at risk)