grizzly bear: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents black bear
Weight: 0.77
, predator
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, carnivore
Weight: 0.73
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, polar bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
is protected 0.96
be are protected 0.92
protect from danger 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, is protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, be are protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be are protected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is protected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is protected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, be are protected)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, protect from danger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be are protected)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, protect from danger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, protect from danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, protect from danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grizzly bear, need protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, need protected)