grocer: is weekly circular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchant
Weight: 0.61
, convenience store
Weight: 0.51
, shop
Weight: 0.50
, trade
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.45
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.35
, grocery
Weight: 0.34
, clothing store
Weight: 0.33
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weekly circular 1.00
is circular 0.86
is weekly ad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is weekly ad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(grocery, is weekly ad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(grocery, is weekly ad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grocer, is weekly circular)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(grocer, is circular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(grocer, is circular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(grocer, is circular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocer, is weekly ad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(grocer, is weekly ad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(grocer, is weekly ad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grocer, is weekly ad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grocer, is circular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grocer, is weekly circular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocer, is weekly circular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grocer, is weekly circular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery, is weekly ad)