grocery store: have profit margins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents department store
Weight: 0.82
, hardware store
Weight: 0.82
, store
Weight: 0.80
, food store
Weight: 0.75
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.86
, supermarket
Weight: 0.76
, gas station
Weight: 0.74
, shop
Weight: 0.69
, gift shop
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
have profit margins 1.00
have low profit margins 0.98
have gross profit margins 0.97
have low gross profit margins 0.95
make profit 0.89
turn profit 0.89
make profits 0.88
make profit from prices 0.88
make profit from low prices 0.87
ever turn profit 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, have low gross profit margins)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(supermarket, have low gross profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(supermarket, have low gross profit margins)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(grocery store, have profit margins)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, have low profit margins)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(grocery store, have low profit margins)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(grocery store, have low profit margins)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, have low profit margins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, have profit margins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grocery store, have profit margins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, have profit margins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(supermarket, have low gross profit margins)