grooming: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents care
Weight: 0.61
, need
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, service
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.54
Siblings beauty salon
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, escort service
Weight: 0.32
, socialization
Weight: 0.32
, cleaning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(socialization, be important in workplace)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, be in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cleaning, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cleaning, be in workplace)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(socialization, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(socialization, be important in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(grooming, be in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(grooming, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cleaning, be in workplace)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socialization, be important in workplace)