ground beef: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.72
, dairy product
Weight: 0.70
, pork
Weight: 0.66
, beef
Weight: 0.65
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, meat
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, fresh food
Weight: 0.36
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
go fast bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ground beef, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ground beef, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ground beef, go fast bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ground beef, go fast bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ground beef, go fast bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, go fast bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ground beef, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)