ground beef: weigh more frozen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.72
, dairy product
Weight: 0.70
, pork
Weight: 0.66
, beef
Weight: 0.65
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, meat
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, fresh food
Weight: 0.36
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
weigh more frozen 1.00
weigh frozen 0.99
weigh less 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, weigh less)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fresh food, weigh less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(fresh food, weigh less)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ground beef, weigh more frozen)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ground beef, weigh frozen)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ground beef, weigh frozen)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(ground beef, weigh frozen)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, weigh frozen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ground beef, weigh less)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ground beef, weigh less)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(ground beef, weigh less)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, weigh less)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, weigh more frozen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ground beef, weigh more frozen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, weigh more frozen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, weigh less)