ground: be in paris

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents platform
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chokehold
Weight: 0.35
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.33
, floor
Weight: 0.32
, other place
Weight: 0.32
, turf
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in paris 1.00
be in france 0.79
be in berlin 0.77
be different from mr slater 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(character, be different from mr slater)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ground, be in paris)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(character, be different from mr slater)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(character, be different from mr slater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(character, be different from mr slater)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ground, be in paris)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ground, be in paris)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ground, be in france)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ground, be in france)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ground, be in france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ground, be in france)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ground, be in berlin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ground, be in berlin)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ground, be in berlin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ground, be in berlin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ground, be in paris)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ground, be in paris)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(character, be different from mr slater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ground, be in paris)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(character, be different from mr slater)