ground: building collapse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents platform
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chokehold
Weight: 0.35
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.33
, floor
Weight: 0.32
, other place
Weight: 0.32
, turf
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
building collapse 1.00
be in concrete buildings formed 0.76
be in buildings formed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(floor, be in concrete buildings formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(floor, be in buildings formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(floor, be in buildings formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(floor, be in buildings formed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(floor, be in concrete buildings formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(floor, be in concrete buildings formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ground, building collapse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ground, building collapse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ground, building collapse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(floor, be in buildings formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ground, building collapse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(floor, be in concrete buildings formed)