groundhog day: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, movie
Weight: 0.63
, comedy
Weight: 0.61
, day
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rainy day
Weight: 0.35
, summer day
Weight: 0.34
, columbus day
Weight: 0.34
, independence day
Weight: 0.34
, labor day
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality joke 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comedy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(day, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comedy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(comedy, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rainy day, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(comedy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(rainy day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(rainy day, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(groundhog day, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(groundhog day, has quality joke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality joke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(groundhog day, has quality joke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(groundhog day, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(comedy, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rainy day, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(comedy, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(groundhog day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)