:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, dig)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, burrow)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rabbit, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rabbit, dig)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(groundhog, dig)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(groundhog, dig)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, dig)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(groundhog, dig)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(rabbit, burrow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, burrow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rabbit, dig)