group: honor individual

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.69
, organization
Weight: 0.64
, way
Weight: 0.61
, shareholder
Weight: 0.60
Siblings caravan
Weight: 0.67
, choir
Weight: 0.67
, peace corps
Weight: 0.66
, corporation
Weight: 0.64
, girl scout
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
honor individual 1.00
honor strong person 0.87
include individual 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(organization, honor strong person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(group, honor individual)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(organization, honor strong person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(organization, honor strong person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(organization, honor strong person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(group, honor individual)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(group, honor individual)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(group, include individual)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(group, include individual)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(group, include individual)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(group, include individual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(group, honor individual)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(group, honor individual)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(organization, honor strong person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(group, honor individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(organization, honor strong person)