grow: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.43
, event
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.35
, opportunity
Weight: 0.35
, problem
Weight: 0.35
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.30
, rise
Weight: 0.29
, build
Weight: 0.29
, power plant
Weight: 0.29
, bloom
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(build, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rise, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rise, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rise, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(build, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(build, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(power plant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(power plant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(grow, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(grow, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(build, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rise, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grow, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(power plant, is expensive)