growing: was in towns diffucult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.52
, topic
Weight: 0.51
, organization
Weight: 0.44
, gardening
Weight: 0.42
, united states
Weight: 0.40
Siblings shrinking
Weight: 0.30
, evolution
Weight: 0.30
, trend
Weight: 0.30
, aging
Weight: 0.30
, fresh food
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in towns diffucult 1.00
was in up towns diffucult 0.98
was in medieval towns diffucult 0.92
was in up medieval towns diffucult 0.92
be in town 0.81
be in town better 0.80
be in small town better 0.80
be in small town 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(growing, was in medieval towns diffucult)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(growing, was in up towns diffucult)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(growing, was in medieval towns diffucult)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(growing, was in up towns diffucult)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(growing, was in medieval towns diffucult)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(growing, was in up towns diffucult)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(growing, was in up medieval towns diffucult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(growing, was in up medieval towns diffucult)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(growing, was in up medieval towns diffucult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(growing, was in medieval towns diffucult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(growing, was in up towns diffucult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growing, was in up medieval towns diffucult)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(growing, be in small town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(growing, be in town better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(growing, be in town)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(growing, be in town better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(growing, be in small town better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(growing, be in small town)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(growing, be in town)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(growing, be in small town better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(growing, be in small town)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(growing, be in town better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(growing, be in town)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(growing, be in small town)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(growing, be in town better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(growing, be in small town better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(growing, be in town)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(growing, be in small town better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(growing, was in towns diffucult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(growing, was in towns diffucult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(growing, was in towns diffucult)