growth: be called exponential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents transformation
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63
, change
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, recovery
Weight: 0.33
, stabilization
Weight: 0.33
, evolution
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called exponential 1.00
is exponential 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(function, is exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growth, be called exponential)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(function, is exponential)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(function, is exponential)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(function, is exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(growth, be called exponential)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(growth, be called exponential)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(growth, is exponential)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(growth, is exponential)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(growth, is exponential)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(growth, is exponential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(growth, be called exponential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growth, be called exponential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(function, is exponential)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growth, be called exponential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(function, is exponential)