growth: be concentrated at rural urban fringe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents transformation
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63
, change
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, recovery
Weight: 0.33
, stabilization
Weight: 0.33
, evolution
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be concentrated at rural urban fringe 1.00
reduce impact of urban sprawl 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(growth, reduce impact of urban sprawl)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(growth, reduce impact of urban sprawl)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(growth, reduce impact of urban sprawl)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(growth, reduce impact of urban sprawl)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(growth, be concentrated at rural urban fringe)