growth: be important to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents transformation
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63
, change
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, recovery
Weight: 0.33
, stabilization
Weight: 0.33
, evolution
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to plants 1.00
be in plants 0.96
be important to many plants 0.96
be in property plant related to range 0.76
be in property plant related to range expected 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(growth, be important to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(growth, be in plants)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(growth, be in plants)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(growth, be in plants)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(growth, be in plants)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(growth, be important to many plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(growth, be important to many plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(growth, be important to many plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(growth, be important to many plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(growth, be important to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(growth, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(growth, be important to plants)